Open Modal
  • Home
  • Shows
    • Weekdays
    • Weekends
    • Weekend Program Schedule
  • Events
  • Podcasts
    • Catholic Cemeteries Association
    • The Talk Of Connecticut
  • Contests
    • Contests
    • Contest Rules
    • Contest Rules- Patriot Bucks
  • More
    • Contact Us
MENU
  • Home
  • Shows
    • Weekdays
    • Weekends
    • Weekend Program Schedule
  • Events
  • Podcasts
    • Catholic Cemeteries Association
    • The Talk Of Connecticut
  • Contests
    • Contests
    • Contest Rules
    • Contest Rules- Patriot Bucks
  • More
    • Contact Us

Senate Judiciary Committee advances Supreme Court ethics bill

July 21, 2023 Staff
  • News Daypop
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Reddit
  • +1
  • Pocket
  • LinkedIn
shutterstock_688282237694012

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted on Thursday to advance legislation that would require the Supreme Court to adopt an ethics code. Called the ‘Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal and Transparency Act,’ the bill from lead sponsor Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse cleared the committee along party lines, 11-10. It is not expected to get the 60 votes required to advance on the Senate floor, and if so, it is likely fail in the GOP-controlled House.

Democrats followed  through on their pledge for legislative action after a series of reports about Justice Clarence Thomas’ relationship with a Republican real estate magnate. A Pro Publica report revealed that Justice Clarence Thomas had accepted vacations and travel from a Republican mega donor; while Justice Samuel Alito has also faced criticism for alleged ethics violations.

Republicans introduced several amendments touching on the protests outside Supreme Court justices’ homes, the leak of the draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade, Supreme Court expansion and imposing new rules on reporters who cover the high court.

The legislation has backing from more than two dozen Senate Democrats, and would require the Supreme Court to adopt a code of conduct for the justices and implement procedures to handle complaints of judicial misconduct. It would also require the high court to impose more rigorous rules for the disclosure of gifts, travel and income received by the justices and their law clerks.

Editorial credit: Katherine Welles / Shutterstock.com

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Previous Story
Seattle Mariners’ Jarred Kelenic put on IL with broken foot after kicking water cooler
Next Story
Police probing link between accused NY serial killer and missing South Carolina woman

Site

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Streaming Help
  • EEO Report
  • WMMW Public File
  • WDRC Public File
  • WSNG Public File

Info

  • VIP Club
  • Contests
  • Events

News

  • Community Calendar
  • Podcasts
© 2025 WDRC-AM - Bloomfield, CT Powered by OneCMS™ | Served by InterTech Media LLC
Are you still listening?
3628718191
Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
ff1f7385a6d6c4c03fa02b64955f0c971e7baa53
1
Loading...