Open Modal
  • Home
  • Shows
    • Weekdays
    • Weekends
    • Weekend Program Schedule
  • Events
  • Podcasts
    • Catholic Cemeteries Association
    • The Talk Of Connecticut
  • Contests
    • Contests
    • Contest Rules
    • Contest Rules- Patriot Bucks
  • More
    • Contact Us
MENU
  • Home
  • Shows
    • Weekdays
    • Weekends
    • Weekend Program Schedule
  • Events
  • Podcasts
    • Catholic Cemeteries Association
    • The Talk Of Connecticut
  • Contests
    • Contests
    • Contest Rules
    • Contest Rules- Patriot Bucks
  • More
    • Contact Us

Supreme Court hears arguments over Trump’s eligibility for 2024 ballot

February 9, 2024 Staff
  • News Daypop
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Reddit
  • +1
  • Pocket
  • LinkedIn
US Supreme court building on the capitol hill in Washington DC^ United States of America

On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard argument on the historic case challenging Donald Trump’s ability to hold office again over his role in the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021. The legal battle centers on an obscure provision of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment — Section 3 — ratified shortly after the Civil War.

The High Court signaled skepticism that Colorado had the power to remove former President Donald Trump from the Republican primary ballot because of his actions trying to overturn the 2020 election results. Trump, who has long denied any wrongdoing, asked the justices to overturn an unprecedented Colorado Supreme Court decision deeming him ineligible to appear on the state’s GOP primary ballot because, it said, he “engaged in insurrection.”

A majority of the justices appeared during the two-hour argument alleging that states do not have a role in deciding whether a presidential candidate can be barred from running under a provision of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment that bars people who “engaged in insurrection” from holding office. While the justices raised concerns about states reaching different conclusions on whether a candidate could run, several indicated that only Congress could enforce the provision at issue.

Editorial credit: Fedor Selivanov / Shutterstock.com

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Previous Story
Indiana Pacers trade Buddy Hield to Philadelphia 76ers in three-player deal
Next Story
Senate advances $95B in aid to Ukraine and Israel after rejecting border deal

Site

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Streaming Help
  • EEO Report
  • WMMW Public File
  • WDRC Public File
  • WSNG Public File

Info

  • VIP Club
  • Contests
  • Events

News

  • Community Calendar
  • Podcasts
WDRC-AM – Bloomfield, CT © 2025 Powered by OneCMS™ | Served by InterTech Media LLC
Are you still listening?
3628718111
Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
105431593a6139a23f65c1190e20723899c86e9a
1
Loading...